I’m starting a thread here for anyone who wants to discuss this article:
Sample of text and formatting from Dr. V’s Website:
So how does Parallel Axis Linearization “P.A.L”combined with Perceived Aperture Symmetry “P.A.S”,
and nexus with Ergogenic Science Help my Putting?
Simply stated the GX1 or GX1-WB Putters are non-pendulous Putting Platform,
that is neither a Blade nor Mallet designation. It is a Putting Platform, based in Physics.
To understand Yar Golf’s Putter philosophy,
you first need a soupcons enlightenment of our Flight Program.
Prop airplanes were left in the dust when it came to the Jets in our Military,
with the obvious alacritous advantage in strike ability with Jets. With the Jet Fighter,
also an unsought of the unexpected.
Just to highlight a few, Costs, Payload, Armaments, and Airstrips Length.
Langley Field and NACA began parallel growth as air power proved its utility during World War I.
The center was originally established to explore the field of aerodynamic research
involving airframe and propulsion engine design and performance.
Early in 1943 the center expanded to include rocket research,
leading to the establishment of a flight station at Wallops Island, Virginia.
A further expansion of the research program permitted Langley Research Center to orbit payloads.
As rocket research grew, aeronautics research continued to expand and played an important part
when subsonic flight was advanced and supersonic and hypersonic flights were introduced.
With the aforementioned, no longer was seat of the pants airplane designs pragmatic.
Experiments also dictated the fiscal need for Platform Air Frames.
Airplanes are truly engineered on an air frame; the reasons are blandly palpable,
so even though every branch of the Military has different needs and requirements
their share the same airframe on a particular Air Plane and are quintessentially the same.
Not to transgress into classified nomenclature or systems.
Ex: The landing gear has to be sturdier on airplanes that employ carrier landings,
therefore the additional weight and stress has to be in the calculation for the airframe,
but the MOI and aeronautical Physics
would be the same for its sibling Model in the Air Force, utilizing stationary landing fields..
So if you are NOT utilizing Yar Golf’s Jet Age Aeronautical Physics Engineering,
I surmise you could correlate earlier Putter designs to a Propeller Plane.
Sure it will eventually get you there,
but somewhere along the line your competitors will be zipping by you with their
Jet Fighter P.A.L GX1 Putter.
When you do your research and the Math, you will agree with our statement.
“You are better off Playing with it… Than against it”
Therefore to avoid all that Myopic and unnecessary nonscientific fuddling, the scientist at Yar developed the only Putter on the market that has Near Zero MOI, and integrated human physiology by incorporating P.A.L.
Hence all the pseudo science and setup shenanigans are Gone, and it Ain’t coming back. Yar Mathematics will be copied many times over and it will be the platform of all successful putters and putting methodology in the future.