20 thoughts on “It's very very very about fucking time

  1. Oh man, read his twitter feed.
    Natalie Reed: Ah well. I’ve rambled enough for tonight. But yeah… thinking about working this into an essay. If there’s a fourth Foundational problem….to radical-feminism (like the kind of thing we can observe in ALL their positions; towards trans stuff, sex work, porn, sex, men, etc)
    Radical feminism is problematic to trans, porn, the accessibility for men to get porn and prostitutes, and men. THE FUCKING MENZ LADIES! WE’RE NOT THINKING ABOUT THE MENZ AND WHAT THEY WANT!
    Also his turn-around justification for women to have ‘agency’ in sex work. Apparently by saying that some women are exploited into sex work we are therefore saying that only the privileged can therefore consent. The fuck dude?
    I hate this dude so much. He is the vilest MRA. MRA’s hate women, they want to subjugate us and relegate us to subhuman status permanently.
    He hates women. He hates us because we have something he wants and WILL NEVER EVER HAVE. He claims that somehow woman is an identity and a brain/thought pattern. So somehow, our own personal behaviours and strengths are nullified because he says so. No matter how we think or behave, we have wimminz brains. Which is the argument used against us since the dawn of fucking time to make sure we stay in the kitchen.
    Fuck you, you god damn scumbag. You’re nearly 30, time to grow up and cut this shit out.

    1. I agree with you on every point, bethanyalexandertate. This guy is just freaking obsessed. A very very very pornsick dude.

  2. THIS FUCKING GEM:
    Natalie Reed: (They being Radfems)
    AND they make the same mistake with trans women. Like how they paint us as “hyper-feminine caricatures” or “made for male desire” or w/e…
    …without EVER thinking about how gatekeeping, the expectations of patriarchal doctors, the dangers and oppressions of a trans-misogynistic
    ..and transphobic society, and the questions of who is and isn’t ABLE to transition often FORCE us into a “hyper-feminine” role, nor do…
    …they think about how standards of gender and perceptions of gender influence our “performance” and how they read that performance.
    So, again, they mistake how something is affected by patriarchy for the nature of the thing itself AS patriarchal.
    The standards of gender and perceptions of gender: You mean the shit you are your fucking ilk go along with. GENDER IS BULLSHIT. Radfems are the primary fighters against gender. What the fuck is he talking about?
    Apparently, radfems are the ones forcing trans to be hyper-feminine. Never mind we’re against that shit.
    Oh my god. Nope. Nope. Too much bullshit today. Got to go outside and have a smoke.

    1. “Like how they paint us as “hyper-feminine caricatures” or “made for male desire” or w/e…
      …without EVER thinking about how gatekeeping, the expectations of patriarchal doctors, the dangers and oppressions of a trans-misogynistic
      ..and transphobic society, and the questions of who is and isn’t ABLE to transition often FORCE us into a “hyper-feminine” role, nor do…
      …they think about how standards of gender and perceptions of gender influence our “performance” and how they read that performance.”
      So, they complain about how the MENZ force other MENZ (themselves) into this hyperfeminine role, then dare to COMPLAIN about feminists pointing it out, because we supposedly haven’t got a CLUE about how femininity is forced on anyone……………..
      This is perhaps part of the same ‘sexism is worse for transwomen’ line, because we have supposedly grown up with it and got USED to it……….

  3. Oh, and this:
    NOT REAL TRANS FALLACY
    Natalie Reed: (in regards to men in “women’s” clothing being caught in the female restroom):
    Perhaps. But a) Those aren’t a result of trans-inclusive policy. When these rare instances happen, they happen REGARDLESS of
    whether or not the facility is trans inclusive or exclusionary.
    And b) They weren’t trans women. So… you’re punishing trans women for something that men do, by setting up policies that hurt trans women while doing nothing about the problem.

    1. There double-speak would be funny if it weren’t for the fact they actually believe the shit they spew…they bleat on and on about “trans-inclusive” which, according to their own umbrella terms, includes the dudes who have no desire to appropriate women and simply get off on wearing clothes and perving on females. Yet, when those same pervs get caught doing illegal and unethical shit, then it becomes “oh, but they weren’t ‘real’ trans.”
      What the fuck ever!

    2. “They weren’t trans women.”
      How do you know they weren’t trans women? Isn’t the only requirement to be considered trans to exclaim ‘I am woman/man’? Anyone can be a creepy perv or violent weirdfucker, regardless of gender what-have-you. Who are you to deny their gender identity? I call misgender!

  4. Fucking lol, tried to get the shitlord to explain his bullshit. He then tried to get my account suspended.
    Also, apparently I’m a sockpuppet for someone else. God forbid that most women disagree with him. We’re all just one radfem with multiple sock puppet accounts.
    I love the fact that he tried to argue that our baseless FEELINGS of safety weren’t as important as his FEELINGS of being a woman.
    What a narcissistic little prick.

  5. Got any inkling as to what caused this? Trannies are treated with silk glove in 3rd wave feminist spaces, did someone accidentally say a word during the wrong moon phase or something?

    1. Yeah the #sharedgirlhood hashtag (or more properly, the entire concept of a shared girlhood as being exclusive to actual female children) is a current target of various of the trans lobby people involved in “social justice” at the moment. They’re to the point of coming down on and “calling out” F2T people who are trying to talk among themselves about how growing up as girls has affected their lives (and possibly their feelings on transitioning).
      Even if someone gave up 100 steps of ground and started referring to herself as “cis,” then it’s still not okay to even say that there should be some space for “cis” women only, to talk about “cis” women issues.
      That alone makes it clear where the agenda is, you mustn’t ever, ever, EVER imply that there’s something to being a “woman” (or even a “cis woman”) which an M2T simply will never experience.
      Worse yet, if you talk about M2T as having experienced “boyhood” it’s beyond the pale because that implies that they have grown up with some privilege (even IF they have legitimately experience different kinds of torment over being gender-nonconforming, in some cases) and in the current trans (read: M2T) narrative, M2T must always be painted as the most oppressed of all groups ever so that they must almost be the most “centered” and the most catered to.
      Any space being used for actual women’s issues must therefore be ceded to them because they are supposedly suffering so much more, you see?
      It’s nuts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


The maximum upload file size: 512 MB.
You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other.