Are you saying my dictionary isn’t “real”? Is that because it is short? Are short dictionaries not “real” dictionaries? What about dictionaries that are missing most of their pages? Are they no longer “real” dictionaries? What if a pamphlet identifies itself as a dictionary? Is it a dictionary then????
hahaha
I think it depends which pages are missing.
Some of the pages/entries that could go missing are things like ’empowerment’. No radfem would ever miss that one disappearing!
Maybe the one-entry dictionary could become ‘a thing’? Might be a little difficult to gain acceptance though. Just accuse everyone of being onepagephobic and threaten to write to the UN about it.
If a page or paragraph ‘defines itself’ as a dictionary, shouldn’t we cater to that? The paragraph might just have a sekrit internal identity or something. Therefore, we should pass laws, just in case.
And hunt down, threaten, implied threats, threaten lawsuits and tattling to the ICC if anyone disagrees…
Hell. Yes.
Then adopting these traits actually changes one’s physical sex! Any evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
LOL, love it! Hits the nail right on the head!
Pure genius.
🙂
And ‘they’ say Chambers dictionary is witty. This is so much better. Thanks. 😉
We need a radfem dictionary for real.
<3
We do need a real radfem dictionary!
Are you saying my dictionary isn’t “real”? Is that because it is short? Are short dictionaries not “real” dictionaries? What about dictionaries that are missing most of their pages? Are they no longer “real” dictionaries? What if a pamphlet identifies itself as a dictionary? Is it a dictionary then????
hahaha
I think it depends which pages are missing.
Some of the pages/entries that could go missing are things like ’empowerment’. No radfem would ever miss that one disappearing!
Maybe the one-entry dictionary could become ‘a thing’? Might be a little difficult to gain acceptance though. Just accuse everyone of being onepagephobic and threaten to write to the UN about it.
YES! Because denying it’s a dictionary denies it’s very existence!
(Which is a thought hate crime.)
If a page or paragraph ‘defines itself’ as a dictionary, shouldn’t we cater to that? The paragraph might just have a sekrit internal identity or something. Therefore, we should pass laws, just in case.
And hunt down, threaten, implied threats, threaten lawsuits and tattling to the ICC if anyone disagrees…
It is the perfect dictionary!!!
GallusMag, love your dictionary!
Love it. Who’s your illustrator. lol.